Robert R. McGill Administrative Law Blog on Lawyers.com

     Doctors hate administrative duties.  They went to medical school, and they want to practice medicine, not law.  If they wanted to engage in vast amounts of paperwork, they would perhaps have gone to law school.  As such, paperwork, writing medical narrative reports for their patients, providing medical opinions in a report -- they are part and parcel of the dreaded "paperwork" -- somewhat like filling out all of the forms for medicare, medicaid, insurance, etc. to get paid.  Such paperwork is often left to the "administrative staff", and therefore doctors are only sporadically required to actually prepare any paperwork.  This presents a peculiar problem for a potential disability retirement applicant, because in order to obtain Federal or USPS Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, an applicant must have a doctor's narrative report which delineates certain issues, addresses certain issues, and renders certain opinions.  Thus, the crucial question becomes:  How does one approach a doctor and convince him or her that preparing a proper medical report is an integral aspect of treating the patient?  The answer:  It must be done with diplomacy, sensitivity, caution, guidance, and understanding, all bundled into one.  Above all, it begins with a relationship -- a patient-doctor relationship that has been formed over many, many years.  And, indeed, that is the requirement under the case-laws at the Merit Systems Protection Board governing disability retirements -- that those opinions rendered by treating doctors of long duration are accorded greater credibility than single-examination doctors.  And it all makes sense.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire