Robert R. McGill Administrative Law Blog on Lawyers.com

     People often come to me at the 2nd (Reconsideration) Stage, or the 3rd (Merit Systems Protection Board) Stage, and ask that I correct the mistakes made in the initial filing.  Most mistakes can be corrected.  Of course, it would have been better if the Applicant had done it properly the first time, for once the Office of Personnel Management views something which should not have been submitted, it cannot be easily retracted -- only further explained.  There are, moreover, certain mistakes which cannot be "explained away" -- such as deliberate omissions or deceptions.  Thus, if the Office of Personnel Management gets the idea that there is an element of deceptiveness in a disability retirement application -- either through omission or deliberate avoidance of an issue -- then it becomes a difficult case to win.  Honesty is always the best policy, and no Disability Retirement applicant should ever engage in any act of covering up any information.  This is conceptually different from emphasizing the elements in a disability retirement application which favor an approval, as opposed to de-emphasizing those elements which tend to obscure the primary elements of an application.  Such artful emphasis/de-emphasis should always be a part of every disability retirement application, coordinating the Applicant's Statement of Disability with supporting medical documentation, to convey a consistent "whole" to the Office of Personnel Management.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire