Robert R. McGill Administrative Law Blog on Lawyers.com

     In most instances, when I am asked to represent an applicant at the Reconsideration Stage, after he or she has attempted to obtain an approval at the Initial Stage without an attorney, I find that the prevailing mistake made is the exaggerated verbosity of the statement itself.  The old adage from Shakespeare, which (I know) is too often quoted (and misquoted), from Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 2, where Queen Gertrude responds by saying, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks," is indeed appropriate and applicable to this issue.  While the applicant's statement of disability must be detailed, complete, and accurate, it must not be "overstated".  It should reflect the factual and medical integrity of the medical opinions and findings as delineated in the medical records, documents and notes; it should never exceed the medical evidence in assertions, claims or scope.  Overzealous self-advocacy is often the problem in cases of disability retirement where the disabled individual represents him or herself.  To this, of course, another common adage is applicable:  "A person representing himself in court has a fool for a client."

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire